Pros and Cons of GMO Crop Farming (2022)

  • Aktar, W. M., Sengupta, D., & Chowdhury, A. (2009). Impact of pesticides use in agriculture: Their benefits and hazards. Interdisciplinary Toxicology, 2(1), 1–12.

  • Altieri, M. A. (2005). The myth of coexistence: Why transgenic crops are not compatible with agroecologically based systems of production. Bulletin of Science Technology & Society, 25, 1–11.

  • Andreasen, M. (2014). GM food in the public mind—facts are not what they used to be. Nature Biotechnology, 32, 25.

  • Apel, A. (2010). The costly benefits of opposing agricultural biotechnology. New Biotechnology, 27, 635–640.

  • Bagavathiannan, M. V., Julier, B., Barre, P., Gulden, R. H., & Van Acker, R. C. (2010). Genetic diversity of feral alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) populations occurring in Manitoba, Canada, and comparison with alfalfa cultivars: An analysis using SSR markers and phenotypic traits. Euphytica, 173, 419–432.

  • Bagla, P. (2010). Hardy cotton-munching pests are latest blow to GM crops. Science, 327, 1439.

  • Baker, J. M., Ochsner, T. E., Venterea, R. T., & Griffis, T. J. (2007). Tillage and soil carbon sequestration—What do we really know? Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 118, 1–5.

  • Bawa, A. S., & Anilakumar, K. R. (2013). Genetically modified foods: Safety, risks and public concerns—a review. Journal of Food Science and Technology, 50(6), 1035–1046.

  • Beckie, H. J., Harker, K. N., Hall, L. M., Warwick, S. I., Légère, A., Sikkema, P. H., . . . Simard, M. J. (2006). A decade of herbicide-resistant crops in Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 86, 1243–1264.

  • Bennett, R. M., Ismael, Y., & Morse, S. (2005). Explaining contradictory evidence regarding impacts of genetically modified crops in developing countries: Varietal performance of transgenic cotton in India. Journal of Agricultural Science, 143, 35–41.

  • Bennett, R., Ismael, Y., Morse, S., & Shankar, B. (2004). Reductions in insecticide use from adoption of Bt cotton in South Africa: Impacts on economic performances and toxic load to the environment. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 142, 665–674.

  • Bennett, R., Phipps, R., Strange, A., & Grey, P. (2004). Environmental and human health impacts of growing genetically modified herbicide tolerant sugar beet: A life-cycle assessment. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2, 273–278.

  • Blackshaw, R. E., & Harker, K. N. (1992). Combined postemergence grass and broadleaf weed control in canola (Brassica napus). Weed Technology, 6, 892–897.

  • Blaine, K., & Powell, D. (2001). Communication of food-related risks. AgBioForum, 4, 179–185.

  • Bloomberg News. (2011). Bayer Settles With Farmers Over Modified Rice Seeds. New York Times.

  • Boucher, D. H. (1999). The paradox of plenty: Hunger in bountiful world. Oakland, CA: Food First Books.

  • Brimner, T. A., Gallivan, G. J., & Stephenson, G. R. (2005). Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Management Science, 61, 47–52.

  • Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2008). Global impact of biotech crops: Socio-economic and environmental effects, 1996–2006. AgBioForum, 11, 21–38.

  • Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2010). GM crops: Global socio-economic and environmental impacts 1996–2008. Dorchester, U.K.: PG Economics.

  • Brookes, G., & Barfoot, P. (2014). Key global economic and environmental impacts of genetically modified (GM) crop use 1996–2012. GM Crops and Food: Biotechnology in Agricultural and the Food Chain, 5, 149–160.

  • Buiatti, M., Christou, P., & Pastore, G. (2013). The application of GMOs in agriculture and in food production for a better nutrition: Two different scientific points of view. Genes Nutrition, 8(3), 255–270.

  • Burney, J. A., Davis, S. J., & Lobell, D. B. (2010). Greenhouse gas mitigation by agricultural intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 107(26), 12052–12057.

  • Carpenter, J. E. (2010). Peer-reviewed surveys indicate positive impact of commercialized GM crops. Nature Biotechnology, 28, 219–221.

  • Chikelu, M. B. A., Elcio, P. G., & Kakoli, G. (2012). Re-orienting crop improvement for the changing climatic conditions of the 21st century. Agriculture and Food Security, 1(1), 1–17.

  • Christos A. D., & Ilias, G. E. (2011). Pesticide exposure, safety issues, and risk assessment indicators. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 8(5), 1402–1419.

  • Christou, P., Capell, T., Kohli, A., Gatehouse, J. A., & Gatehouse, A. M. R. (2006). Recent developments and future prospects in insect pest control in transgenic crops. Trends Plant Science, 11, 302–308.

  • Christou, P., & Twyman, R. M. (2004) The potential of genetically enhanced plants to address food insecurity. Nutrition Research Reviews, 17, 23–42.

  • Chu, Y., Faustinelli, P., Ramos, M. L., Hajduch, M., Stevenson, S., Thelen, J. J., et al. (2008). Reduction of IgE binding and nonpromotion of Aspergillus flavus fungal growth by simultaneously silencing Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 in peanut. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 56, 11225–11233.

  • Cong, L., Ran, F. A., Cox, D., Lin, S., Barretto, R., Habib, N., . . . Zhang, F. (2013). Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science, 339, 819–823.

  • Czako, M., Feng, X., He, Y., Liang, D., & Marton, L. (2005). Genetic modification of wetland grasses for phytoremediation. Zeitschrift fu¨r Naturforschung, 60c, 285–291.

  • Dale, P. J., Clarke, B., & Fontes, E. M. G. (2002). Potential for the environmental impact of transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology, 20(6), 567–574.

  • Daniell, H. (2002). Molecular strategies for gene containment in transgenic crops. Nature Biotechnology, 20, 581–586.

    (Video) Genetically Modified Foods and Their Pros And Cons

  • Dill, G. M., CaJacob, C. A., & Padgette, S. R. (2008). Glyphosate-resistant crops: Adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Management Science, 64, 326–331.

  • Dively, G. P., Rose, R., Sears, M. K., Hellmich, R. L., Stanley-Horn, D. E., Calvin, D. D., . . . Anderson, P. L. (2004). Effects on monarch butterfly larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1Ab-expressing corn during anthesis. Environmental Entomology, 33(4), 1116–1125.

  • Domingo J. L. (2016). Safety assessment of GM plants: An updated review of the scientific literature. Food and Chemical Toxicology, 95, 12–18.

  • Dunwell, J. M., & Ford, C. S. (2005). Technologies for biological containment of GM and non-GM crops. Defra Contract CPEC 47. London: DEFRA.

  • Ellstrand, N. (2003). Current knowledge of gene flow in plants: Implications for transgenic flow. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Science, 358(1434), 1163–1170.

  • Ellstrand, N. C., Prentice, H. C., & Hancock, J. F. (1999). Gene flow and introgression from domesticated plants into their wild relatives. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 30, 539–563.

  • Ezeonu, C. S., Tagbo, R., Anike, E. N., Oje, O. A., & Onwurah, I. N. E. O. (2012). Biotechnological tools for environmental sustainability: Prospects and challenges for environments in Nigeria—a standard review. Biotechnology Research International, 1, 1–26.

  • Fawcett, R., & Towery, D. (2003). Conservation tillage and plant biotechnology: How new technologies can improve the environment by reducing the need to plow. West Lafayette, IN: Conservation Technology Information Center (CTIC), Purdue University.

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Hallahan, C., Nehring, R., Wechsler, S., & Grube, A. (2012). Conservation tillage, herbicide use, and genetically engineered crops in the United States: The case of soybeans. AgBioForum, 15, 231–241.

  • Fernandez-Cornejo, J., Wechsler, S. J., Livingston, M., & Mitchell, L. (2014). Genetically engineered crops in the United States. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture—Economic Research Service.

  • Finger, R., El Benni, N., Kaphengst, T., Evans, C., Herbert, S., Lehmann, B., . . . Stupak, N. (2011). A meta-analysis on farm-level costs and benefits of GM crops. Sustainability, 3(5), 743–762.

  • Fischer, K., Ekener-Petersen, E., Rydhmer, L., & Edvardsson Björnberg, K. (2015). Social impacts of GM crops in agriculture: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 7, 8598–8620.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2004). Agricultural biotechnology: Meeting the needs of the poor? The state of food and agriculture 2003–04. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

  • Food and Agriculture Organization. (2015). FAO statistical pocketbook 2015: World food and agriculture. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization.

  • Friedrich, T., & Kassam, A. (2012). No-till farming and the environment: Do no-till systems require more chemicals? Outlooks on Pest Management, 23(4), 153–157.

  • Gay, P. B., & Gillespie, S. H. (2005). Antibiotic resistance markers in genetically modified plants: A risk to human health? Lancet Infect Disease, 5(10), 637–646.

  • Gewin, V. (2003). Genetically modified corn—environmental benefits and risks. PLoS Biology, 1(1), e8.

  • Gilbert, N. (2013). A hard look at GM crops. Nature, 497, 24–26.

  • Giller, K. E., Witter, E., Corbeels, M., & Pablo, T. (2009). Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: The heretics’ view. Field Crops Research, 114, 23–34.

  • Golden Rice Project. (2009). Golden Rice is part of the solution..

  • Gómez-Galera, S., Rojas, E., Sudhakar, D., Zhu, C., Pelacho, A. M., Capell, T., & Christou, P. (2010). Critical evaluation of strategies for mineral fortification of staple food crops. Transgenic Research, 19, 165–180.

  • Gray, R. (2001). Introduction. In M. Fulton, H. Furtan, D. Gosnell, R. Gray, J. Hobbs, J. Holzman, et al. (Eds.), Transforming agriculture: The benefits and costs of genetically modified crops. Ottawa, ON: Canadian Biotechnology Advisory Committee.

  • Gunther, M. (2007, July 2). Attack of the mutant rice. Fortune.

  • Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., & Kirkland, K. J. (1995). Ethametsulfuron interactions with grass herbicides on canola (Brassica napus, B. rapa). Weed Technology, 9, 91–98.

  • Harker, K. N., Blackshaw, R. E., Kirkland, K. J., Derksen, D. A., & Wall, D. (2000). Herbicide-tolerant canola: Weed control and yield comparisons in western Canada. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 80(3), 647–654.

  • Hatfield, J., Takle, G., Grotjahn, R., Holden, P., Izaurralde, R. C., Mader, T., (2014). Agriculture. In J. M. Melillo, T. C. R. Terese, & G. W. Yohe (Eds.), Climate change impacts in the United States: The Third National Climate Assessment (pp. 150–174). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

  • Herdt, R. W. (2006). Biotechnology in agriculture. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31, 265–295.

  • Herman, E. M. (2003). Genetically modified soybeans and food allergies. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 1317–1319.

  • Hillocks, R. J. (2009). GM cotton for Africa. Outlook on Agriculture, 38, 311–316.

  • Hossain, F., Pray, C. E., Lu, Y., Huang, J., Fan, C., & Hu, R. (2004). Genetically modified cotton and farmers’ health in China. International Journal of Occupational Environmental Health, 10, 296–303.

  • Huang, J., Hu, R., Rozelle, S., & Pray, C. (2005). Insect-resistance GM rice in farmers’ fields: Assessing productivity and health effects in China. Science, 308, 688–690.

    (Video) Are GMOs Good or Bad? Genetic Engineering & Our Food

  • Inghelbrecht, L., Dessein, J., & Huylenbroeck, G. V. (2014). The non-GM crop regime in the EU: How do industries deal with this wicked problem? Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences, 70, 103–112.

  • International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications [ISAAA]. (2015). Annual report executive summary, 20th anniversary (1996 to 2015) of the global commercialization of biotech crops: Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief No. 51. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

  • James, C. (2010). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2010. ISAAA Brief No. 42. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

  • James, C. (2014). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2013. ISAAA Brief No. 49. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

  • James, C. (2015a). Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2014. ISAAA Brief No. 49. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

  • James, C. (2015b). 20th Anniversary (1996 to 2015) of the global commercialization of biotech crops: Highlights in 2015. ISAAA Brief No. 51. Ithaca, NY: ISAAA.

  • Kaskey, J. (2012, November 16). DuPont-Dow corn defeated by armyworms in Florida: Study. Bloomberg News.

  • Key, S., Ma, J. K.-C., & Drake, P. M. W. (2008). Genetically modified plants and human health. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 101(6), 290–298.

  • Kleter, G. A., Bhula, R., Bodnaruk, K., Carazo, E., Felsot, A. S., Harris, C. A., . . . Wong, S.-S. (2007). Altered pesticide use on transgenic crops and the associated general impact from an environmental perspective. Pest Management Science, 63(11), 1107–1115.

  • Kloppenburg, J. R. (1990). First the seed: The political economy of plant biotechnology. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press.

  • Klümper, W., & Qaim, M. (2014). A meta-analysis of the impacts of genetically modified crops. PLoS ONE, 9(11), e111629.

  • Knispel, A. L., McLachlan, S. M., Van Acker, R. C., & Friesen, L. F. (2008). Gene flow and multiple herbicide resistance in escaped canola populations. Weed Science, 56, 72–80.

  • Knox, O. G. G., Vadakattu, G. V. S. R., Gordon, K., Lardner, R., & Hicks, M. (2006). Environmental impact of conventional and Bt insecticidal cotton expressing one and two Cry genes in Australia. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 57, 501–509.

  • Kynda R. C., & Moeltner, K. (2006). Genetically modified food market participation and consumer risk perceptions: A cross-country comparison. Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 54, 289–310.

  • Lal, R. (2004). Soil carbon sequestration impacts on global climate change and food security. Science, 304(5677), 1623–1627.

  • Lehrer, S. B., & Bannon, G. A. (2005). Risks of allergic reactions to biotech proteins in foods: Perception and reality. Allergy, 60(5), 559–564.

  • Lemaux, P. G. (2009). Genetically engineered plants and foods: A scientist’s analysis of the issues (Part II). Annual Review Plant Biology, 60, 511–559.

  • Lipton, M., & Longhurst, V. (2011). New seeds and poor people. Abingdon, U.K.: Routledge.

  • Liu, Y. B., Darmency, H., Stewart, C. N., Wei, W., Jr., Tang, Z. X., & Ma, K. P. (2015). The effect of Bt-transgene introgression on plant growth and reproduction in wild Brassica juncea. Transgenic Research, 24, 537–547.

  • Lucht, J. M. (2015). Public acceptance of plant biotechnology and GM crops. Viruses, 7(8), 4254–4281.

  • Macnaghten, P., & Carro-Ripalda, S. (2015). Governing agricultural sustainability: Global lessons from GM crops. London: Routledge.

  • Mallory-Smith, C., & Zapiola, M. (2008). Gene flow from glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Management Science, 64, 428–440.

  • Mann, S. (2015). Is “GMO free” an additional “organic”? On the economics of chain segregation. AgBioForum, 18, 26–33.

  • Mannion, A. M. (1995a). Biotechnology and environmental quality. Progress in Physical Geography, 19, 192–215.

  • Mannion, A. M. (1995b). Agriculture and environmental change: Temporal and spatial dimensions. Chichester, U.K.: John Wiley.

  • Mannion, A. M. (1995c). The three Bs: Biodiversity, biotechnology and business. Environmental Conservation, 22, 201–210.

  • Mannion, A. M., & Morse, S. (2013). GM crops 1996–2012: A review of agronomic, environmental and socio-economic impacts. University of Reading, Geographical Paper No. 195. Retrieved from

  • Marvier, M., & Van Acker, R. C. (2005). Can crop transgenes be kept on a leash? Frontier Ecology Environment, 3, 99–106.

  • Mauro, I. J., & McLachlan, S. M. (2008). Farmer knowledge and risk analysis: Post release evaluation of herbicide-tolerant canola in Western Canada. Risk Analysis, 28(2), 463–476.

  • Mauro, I. J., McLachlan, S. M., & Van Acker, R. C. (2009). Farmer knowledge and a priori risk analysis: Pre-release evaluation of genetically modified Roundup Ready wheat across the Canadian prairies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 16, 689–701.

  • Montgomery, D. R. (2007). Soil erosion and agricultural sustainability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States, 104, 13268–13272.

  • Morse, S., & Mannion, A. M. (2009). Can genetically-modified cotton contribute to sustainable development in Africa? Progress in Development Studies, 9, 225–247.

  • Morse, S., Mannion, A. M., & Evans, C. (2011). Location, location, location: Presenting evidence for genetically modified crops. Applied Geography, 34(2), 274–280.

  • Mosher, G., & Hurburgh, C. (2010). Transgenic plant risk: Coexistence and economy. Encyclopedia of Biotechnology in Agriculture and Food, 1, 639–642.

    (Video) Transgenic Crops – The Methods, Pros & Cons of GMOs and Biotechnology

  • Munkvold, G. P., Hellmich, R. L., & Rice, L. G. (1999). Comparison of fumonisin concentrations in kernels of transgenic Bt corn hybrids and non-transgenic hybrids. Plant Disease, 81, 556–565.

  • Naqvi, S., Zhu, C., Farre, G., Ramessar, K., Bassie, L., Breitenbach, J., . . . Christou, P. (2009). Transgenic multivitamin corn through biofortification of endosperm with three vitamins representing three distinct metabolic pathways. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences, USA, 106, 7762–7767.

  • National Research Council. (2010). The impact of genetically engineered crops on farm sustainability in the United States. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

  • Nazarko, O. M., Van Acker, R. C., & Entz, M. H. (2005). Strategies and tactics for herbicide use reduction in field crops in Canada: A review. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 85, 457–479.

  • Newell-McGloughlin, M. (2008). Nutritionally improved agricultural crops. Plant Physiology, 147, 939–953.

  • Nickson, T. E. (2005). Crop biotechnology—the state of play. In G. M. Poppy & M. J. Wilkinson (Eds.), Gene flow from GM plants (pp. 12–42). Oxford: Blackwell.

  • Oelck, M. M., MacDonald, R., Belyk, M., Ripley, V., Weston, B., Bennett, C., et al. (1995, July 4–7). Registration, safety assessment and agronomic performance of transgenic canola cv. “Innovator” in Canada. In D. J. Murphy (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th International Rapeseed Congress (Vol. 4, pp. 1420–1432). Cambridge, U.K.: Organising Committee of the Ninth International Rapeseed Congress.

  • Oerke, E. C. (2006). Crop losses to pests, centenary review. Journal of Agricultural Science, 144, 31–43.

  • Owen, M. D. K. (2008). Weed species shifts in glyphosate-resistant crops. Pest Management Science, 64, 377–387.

  • Owen, M. D. K. (2009). Herbicide-tolerant genetically modified crops: Resistance management. In N. Ferry & A. M. R. Gatehouse (Eds.), Environmental impact of genetically modified crops (pp. 115–164). Wallingford, U.K.: CABI.

  • Owen, M. D. K., Young, B. G., Shaw, D. R., Wilson, R. G., Jordan, D. L., Dixon, P. M., & Weller, S. C. (2011). Benchmark study on glyphosate-resistant crop systems in the United States. Part 2: Perspectives. Pest Management Science, 67, 747–757.

  • Paarlberg, R. (2008). Starved for science: How biotechnology is being kept out of Africa. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

  • Park, R. J., McFarlane, I., Phipps, R. H., & Ceddia, G. (2011). The role of transgenic crops in sustainable development. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 9, 2–21.

  • Pemsl, D., Waibel, H., & Gutierrez, A. P. (2005). Why do some Bt-cotton farmers in China continue to use high levels of pesticide? International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability, 3, 44–56.

  • Phillips, P. W. B. (2003). The economic impact of herbicide tolerant canola in Canada. In N. Kalaitzandonakes (Ed.), The economic and environmental impacts of Agbiotech: A global perspective (pp. 119–140). New York: Kluwer Academic.

  • Pimentel, D., Hunter, M. S., Lagro, J. A., Efroymson, R. A., Landers, J. C., Mervis, F. T., et al. (1989). Benefits and risks of genetic engineering in agriculture. BioScience, 39(9), 606–614.

  • Pinstrup-Andersen, P. (1999). Agricultural biotechnology, trade, and the developing countries. AgBioForum, 2, 215–217.

  • Potrykus, I. (2010). Lessons from the “Humanitarian Golden Rice” project: Regulation prevents development of public good genetically engineered crop products. Nature Biotechnology, 27, 466–472.

  • Potrykus, I. (2012). “Golden Rice,” a GMO-product for public good, and the consequences of GE-regulation. Journal of Plant Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 21, 68–75.

  • Powlson, D. S., Stirling, C. M., Jat, M. L., Gerard, B. G., Palm, C. A., Sanchez, P. A., & Cassman, K. G. (2014). Limited potential of no-till agriculture for climate change mitigation. Nature Climate Change, 4, 678–683.

  • Prakash, D., Sonika, V., Ranjana, B., & Tiwary, B. N. (2011). Risks and precautions of genetically modified organisms. ISRN Ecology, ID 369573.

  • Pray, C. E., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Rozelle, S. (2002). Five years of Bt cotton in China—the benefits continue. Plant Journal, 31(4), 423–430.

  • Pray, C. E., Nagarajan, L., Huang, J., Hu, R., & Ramaswami, B. (2011). Impact of Bt cotton, the potential future benefits from biotechnology in China and India. In C. Carter, G. Moschini, & I. Sheldon (Eds.), Genetically modified food and global welfare (pp. 83–114). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.

  • Qaim, M. (2003). Bt cotton in India: Field trial results and economic projections. World Development, 31, 2115–2127.

  • Qaim, M. (2009). The economics of genetically modified crops. Annual Review Resource Economics, 1, 665–693.

  • Qaim, M. (2010). Benefits of genetically modified crops for the poor: Household income, nutrition and health. New Biotechnology, 27, 552–557.

  • Qaim, M., & Traxler, G. (2005). Roundup ready soybeans in Argentina: Farm level and aggregate welfare effects. Agricultural Economics, 32, 73–86.

  • Ramaswami, B., Pray, C. E., & Lalitha, N. (2012). The spread of illegal transgenic cotton varieties in India: Biosafety regulation, monopoly, and enforcement. World Development, 40(1), 177–188.

  • Reichman, J. R., Watrud, L. S., Lee, E. H., Burdick, C. A., Bollman, M. A., Storm, M. J., . . . Mallory-Smith, C. (2006). Establishment of transgenic herbicide-resistant creeping bentgrass (Agrostis stolonifera L.) in nonagronomic habitats. Molecular Ecology, 15, 4243–4255.

  • Roh, J. Y., Choi, J. Y., Li, M. S., Jin, B. R., & Je, Y. H. (2007). Bacillus thuringiensis as a specific, safe, and effective tool for insect pest control. Journal of Microbial Biotechnology, 17(4), 547–559.

  • Roller, S., & Harlander, S. (1998). Genetic modifications in the food industry: A strategy for food quality improvement. London: Blackie Academic & Professional.

  • Rotolo, G. C., Francis, C., Craviotto, R. M., Viglia, S., Pereyra, A., & Ulgiati, S. (2015). Time to rethink the GMO revolution in agriculture. Ecological Informatics, 26, 35–49.

    (Video) Pros and Cons of GMOs

  • Sakakibara, K., & Saiko, K. (2006). Review: Genetically modified plants for the promotion of human health. Biotechnology Letters, 28, 1983–1991.

  • Sauter, C., Poletti, S., Zhang, P., & Gruissem, W. (2006). Biofortification of essential natural compounds and trace elements in rice and cassava. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 65, 153–159.

  • Semal, J. (2007). Patentability of living organisms: From biopatent to bio-big-bang. Chairs Agricultures, 16, 41–48.

  • Seralini, G. E., Mesnage, R., Defarge, N., Gress, S., Hennequin, D., Clair, E., . . . de Vendômois, J. S. (2013). Answers to critics: Why there is a long term toxicity due to a Roundup-tolerant genetically modified maize and to a Roundup herbicide. Food Chemistry Toxicology, 53, 476–483.

  • Sexton, S., & Zilberman, D. (2011). Biotechnology and biofuel. In C. Carter, G. Moschini, & I. Sheldon (Eds.), Genetically modified food and global welfare (pp. 225–242). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.

  • Smale, M., Zambrano, P., Gruère, G., Falck-Zepeda, J., Matuschke, I., Horna, D., . . . Jones, H. (2009). Measuring the economic impacts of transgenic crops in developing agriculture during the first decade. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).

  • Smyth, S. J., Gusta, M., Belcher, K., Phillips, P. W. B., & Castle, D. (2011). Environmental impacts from herbicide tolerant canola production in Western Canada. Agricultural Systems, 104, 403–410.

  • Stein, A. J., Sachdev, H. P. S., & Qaim, M. (2008). Genetic engineering for the poor: Golden Rice and public health in India. World Development, 36, 144–158.

  • Stewart Jr, C. N., Halfhill, M. D., & Warwick, S. I. (2003). Transgene introgression from genetically modified crops to their wild relatives. Nature Reviews Genetics, 4, 806.

  • Subramanian, A., & Qaim, M. (2010). The impact of Bt cotton on poor households in rural India. Journal of Development Studies, 46, 295–311..

  • Tabashnik, B. E., Brevault, T., & Carriere, Y. (2013). Insect resistance in Bt crops: Lessons from the first billion acres. Nature Biotechnology, 31, 510–521.

  • Taylor I. E. P. (2007). Genetically engineered crops: Interim policies, uncertain legislation. New York: Haworth.

  • Trigo, E., Cap, E., Malach, V., & Villareal, F. (2009). The case of zero-tillage technology in Argentina. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute.

  • Uchida, E., Ouchi, T., Suzuki, Y., Yoshida, T., Habe, H., Yamaguchi, I., … Nojiri, H. (2005). Secretion of bacterial xenobiotic degrading enzymes from transgenic plants by an apoplastic expressional system: An applicability for phytoremediation. Environmental Science and Technology, 39, 7671–7677.

  • United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs, Population Division. (2017). World population prospects: The 2017 revision, key findings and advance tables.

  • United States Department of Agriculture. (2009). US Department of Agriculture GAIN report: EU-27 biotechnology: GE plants and animals. Washington, DC, USDA.

  • U.S. District Court, Kansas. (2017). Syngenta AG MIR162 Corn Litigation, 14-md-2591. Retrieved from

  • Van Acker, R. C., Brule-Babel, A. L., & Friesen, L. F. (2004). Intraspecific gene movement can create environmental risk: The example of Roundup Ready® wheat in western Canada. In B. Breckling & R. Verhoeven (Eds.), Risk, hazard, damage—specification of criteria to assess environmental impact of genetically modified organisms (pp. 37–47). Bonn, Germany: Naturschutz und Biolische Viefalt.

  • Van Acker, R. C., & Cici, S. Z. H. (2014). Coexistence in the case of a perennial species complex: The potential challenges of coexistence between GM and non-GM Prunus species. AgBioForum, 17, 70–74.

  • Van Acker, R. C., Cici, S. Z. H., Michael, L., Ryan, C., & Sachs, E. (2015, November 17–20). Gaining societal acceptance of biotechnology: The case for societal engagement. In Seventh International Conference on Coexistence between Genetically Modified (GM) and Non-GM Based Agricultural Supply Chains (GMCC-15). Amsterdam.

  • Van Acker, R. C., McLean, N., & Martin, R. C. (2007). Development of quality assurance protocols to prevent GM-contamination of organic crops. In J. Cooper, U. Niggli, & C. Leifert (Eds.), Handbook of organic food safety and quality (pp. 466–489). Boca Raton, FL: CRC.

  • Verma, S. R. (2013). Genetically modified plants: Public and scientific perceptions. ISRN Biotechnology, 2013, 820671.

  • Vigani, M., & Olper, A. (2013). GMO standards, endogenous policy and the market for information. Food Policy, 43, 32–43.

  • Wafula, D., Waithaka, M., Komen, J., & Karembu, M. (2012). Biosafety legislation and biotechnology development gains momentum in Africa. GM Crops Food, 3(1), 72–77.

  • Wesseler, J., Scatasta, S., & El Hadji, F. (2011). The environmental benefits and costs of genetically modified (GM) crops. In C. Carter, G. Moschini, & I. Sheldon (Eds.), Genetically modified food and global welfare (pp. 173–199). Bingley, U.K.: Emerald.

  • White, P. J., & Broadley, M. R. (2009). Biofortification of crops with seven mineral elements often lacking in human diets: Iron, zinc, copper, calcium, magnesium, selenium and iodine. New Phytologist, 182, 49–84.

  • Wise, M., Calvin, K., Thomson, A., Clarke, L., Bond-Lamberty, B., Sands, R., … Edmonds, J. (2009). Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science, 324, 1183–1186.

  • Wolt, J. D., Keese, P., Raybould, A., Fitzpatrick, J. W, Burachik, M., Gray, A., … Wu, F. (2010). Problem formulation in the environmental risk assessment for genetically modified plants. Transgenic Research, 19, 425–436.

  • Wu, F. (2006). Mycotoxin reduction in Bt corn: Potential economic, health, and regulatory impacts. Transgenic Research, 15, 277–289.

  • Yanagisawa, S. (2004). Improved nitrogen assimilation using transcription factors. Plant Research, 2004, 1–4.

  • You, C. B., Song, W., Lin, M., Hai, W. L., Li, P., & Wang, Y. T. (2012). Allergens host plant interaction. In C. B. You, Z. I. Chen, & Y. Ding (Eds.), Biotechnology in agriculture: Proceedings of the First Asia-Pacific Conference on Agricultural Biotechnology, Beijing, China, 20–24 August 1992 (pp. 468–473). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer.

  • Yuan, D., Bassie, L., Sabalza, M., Miralpeix, B., Dashevskaya, S., Farre, G., … Christou, P. (2011). The potential impact of plant biotechnology on the millennium development goals. Plant Cell Reports, 30, 249–265.

  • Zhu, C., Naqvi, S., Breitenbach, J., Sandmann, G., Christou, P., & Capell, T. (2008). Combinatorial genetic transformation generates a library of metabolic phenotypes for the carotenoid pathway in corn. Proceedings National Academy of Sciences USA, 105, 18232–18237.

    (Video) Let’s Discuss GMO Effects on the Environment | GMO Answers


What are the pros of GMO crops? ›

Tastier food. Disease- and drought-resistant plants that require fewer environmental resources (such as water and fertilizer) Less use of pesticides. Increased supply of food with reduced cost and longer shelf life.

What are the cons of genetically modified crops? ›

Practical concerns around GM crops include the rise of insect pests and weeds that are resistant to pesticides. Other concerns around GM crops include broad seed variety access for farmers and rising seed costs as well as increased dependency on multinational seed companies.

What are the pros and cons of GMO? ›

GMO foods are designed to be healthier and cheaper to produce. Advantages of GMO foods include added nutrients, fewer pesticides, and cheaper prices. Disadvantages of GMO foods can be allergic reactions or increased antibiotic resistance.

What are the benefits and risks of GMO? ›

The most notable GMO risks to humans are the potential development of allergens to GM related crops and toxicity from GM crops. However, studies also show GM crops have benefits including the increased nutritional value in foods.

What are the 3 risks of GMOs in agriculture? ›

These include enhanced pathogenicity, emergence of a new disease, pest or weed, increased disease burden if the recipient organism is a pathogenic microorganism or virus, increased weed or pest burden if the recipient organism is a plant or invertebrate, and adverse effects on species, communities, or ecosystems.

Why are GMOs bad for agriculture? ›

GMO agriculture has led to superweeds and superpests that are extraordinarily difficult for farmers to manage. Farmers affected by resistant pests must revert to older and more toxic chemicals, more labor or more intensive tillage, which overshadow the promised benefits of GMO technology.

What are negative GMO effects? ›

One specific concern is the possibility for GMOs to negatively affect human health. This could result from differences in nutritional content, allergic response, or undesired side effects such as toxicity, organ damage, or gene transfer.

What are the 3 risks of GMOs in environment? ›

GMOs - environmental concerns
  • Increased use of toxic herbicides and pesticides.
  • Pleiotropy – unforeseen consequences.
  • Contamination.

What are at least 3 Pros good things to GMOs? ›

Growing GMO crops leads to environmental benefits such as reduced pesticide use, less water waste, and lower carbon emissions.

What are 5 Advantages GMO? ›

Some benefits of genetic engineering in agriculture are increased crop yields, reduced costs for food or drug production, reduced need for pesticides, enhanced nutrient composition and food quality, resistance to pests and disease, greater food security, and medical benefits to the world's growing population.

Why are GMOs good for farmers? ›

GMO crops that are tolerant to herbicides help farmers control weeds without damaging the crops. When farmers use these herbicide-tolerant crops they do not need to till the soil, which they normally do to get rid of weeds. This no-till planting helps to maintain soil health and lower fuel and labor use.

How safe is genetically modified crop? ›

Yes. There is no evidence that a crop is dangerous to eat just because it is GM. There could be risks associated with the specific new gene introduced, which is why each crop with a new characteristic introduced by GM is subject to close scrutiny.

What is the most risk of GMOs? ›

The major risk from the production of the transgene will lie in the use of novel proteins or other molecules produced by the transgenic organisms. Either in the native form or, following modifications in the human body, such molecules could be inimical to human health (e.g. through allergies).

How do farmers feel about GMOs? ›

Summary: Farmers are upbeat about genetically modified crops, according to new research. Both farmers who have been involved in GM crop trials and those who have not, regard GM as a simple extension of previous plant breeding techniques, such as those which have produced today's established crop types.

Why is GMO bad for the environment? ›

Research indicates that GM crop technology can result in a net increase in herbicide use and can foster the growth of herbicide resistant weeds. In addition, there is concern that the use of GM crops may negatively impact the agriculture ecosystem.

What are the 3 benefits of GMOS in environment? ›

Lower carbon emissions. Healthier soil. More food on less land. Less food waste.

What are the 10 advantages of GMOs? ›

Beyond health, the benefits of GMOs are widespread:
  • Less cost.
  • Higher yields.
  • Fewer chemicals and pesticides.
  • Less soil erosion than unmodified crops.
  • Used in medicine to produce life-saving vaccines, insulin, and treatments for diseases.
10 Dec 2021

What are the 3 benefits of GMOs in environment? ›

Lower carbon emissions. Healthier soil. More food on less land. Less food waste.

What are the negative effects of GMOs? ›

What are the new “unexpected effects” and health risks posed by genetic engineering?
  • Toxicity. Genetically engineered foods are inherently unstable. ...
  • Allergic Reactions. ...
  • Antibiotic Resistance. ...
  • Immuno-suppression. ...
  • Cancer. ...
  • Loss of Nutrition.

Are GMO crops cheaper? ›

GMO foods are easier and less costly for farmers to grow, which makes them cheaper for the consumer.

Why do we need GMO crops in agriculture? ›

Most of the GMO crops grown today were developed to help farmers prevent crop and food loss and control weeds. The three most common traits found in GMO crops are: Resistance to certain damaging insects. Tolerance of certain herbicides used to control weeds.


1. GM Crops | Genetics | Biology | FuseSchool
(FuseSchool - Global Education)
2. The real problem with GMO Food
(Our Changing Climate)
3. Avellaneda Discusses Advantages of GMO Crops
4. GMOs 101 - What are the benefits of GMO crops?
(GMO Answers)
5. Pros and Cons of GMO
(Antonette Nacional)
6. GMO and its Negative Effects

Top Articles

You might also like

Latest Posts

Article information

Author: Dong Thiel

Last Updated: 11/28/2022

Views: 6279

Rating: 4.9 / 5 (59 voted)

Reviews: 90% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Dong Thiel

Birthday: 2001-07-14

Address: 2865 Kasha Unions, West Corrinne, AK 05708-1071

Phone: +3512198379449

Job: Design Planner

Hobby: Graffiti, Foreign language learning, Gambling, Metalworking, Rowing, Sculling, Sewing

Introduction: My name is Dong Thiel, I am a brainy, happy, tasty, lively, splendid, talented, cooperative person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.